Unpopular Science
Sidenote illustration by Jess DG Hayes for chapter 8, “Mind the Gap”
Sidenote illustration by Jess DG Hayes

Chapter 08 of 50

Mind the Gap

“If I were to awaken after having sleptfor a thousand years,my first question would be:has the Riemann Hypothesis been proven?”
David Hilbert, 1900

In 2013, an unaffiliated Yitang Zhang proved there exists a finite bound B (initially 70,000,000) such that infinitely many prime pairs differ by at most B. While prime gaps can grow arbitrarily large, this breakthrough showed they cannot drift apart arbitrarily far. The Polymath8 collaboration subsequently reduced this bound to a few hundred. Zhang’s approach combined distribution properties of primes in arithmetic progressions with an advanced sieving technique, resolving a fundamental question about number patterns while falling short of proving the Twin Prime Conjecture that infinitely many primes differ by exactly 2.

Topics

  • Prime Gaps
  • Twin Prime Conjecture
  • Zhang’s Bounded Gaps
  • 70 Million Bound
  • Weighted Sieve Method
  • Polymath8 Collaboration
  • Maynard Simplification
  • Green-Tao Progressions
  • Cramér’s Conjecture
  • Riemann Hypothesis
  • Zhang’s Trajectory

Sidenote

Top (Prime Distribution): Natural numbers 1–25 with primes (red) and composites (teal), showing that twin prime pairs like (3,5), (5,7), (11,13), (17,19). Second (Gap Sizes): Consecutive primes with gap sizes marked by blue arrows, from the minimal gap of 2 to larger separations such as 8 between 23 and 31. Third (Gap Analysis): Scatter plot of prime gaps pn+1−pnp_{n+1} - p_n versus pnp_n for the first 10,000 primes, showing that most gaps are small with rare large exceptions. Reference lines mark key bounds: twin primes (gap = 2), Polymath8’s refined bound (246), and Zhang’s original breakthrough (70 million). Infinitely many gaps stay below some fixed bound, guaranteeing points always appear below these lines.

Note the key distinction: for small gaps we seek absolute bounds (fixed numbers such as 246), while for large gaps the bounds are functions of pnp_n that grow as primes get larger.

Bottom (Maximum Gaps): How large can prime gaps become? This shows the largest observed gaps (light blue) compared to theoretical predictions. The red lines show upper bound conjectures for maximum gap size, while colored lower bounds prove that gaps must occasionally be large. The scatter demonstrates that while most gaps are small relative to the local prime density, some gaps are much larger than the typical spacing in their region.

Coming to YouTube

Beyond Popular Science: the films

Each chapter is becoming a short film: the book’s own words, read to camera, with its figures, sources and equations animated alongside.

The films go out under the UK edition’s title, Beyond Popular Science. The fifty chapters are the same in both editions.

Coming soon

Subscribe to the channelYouTube (opens in a new tab)
Front cover of Unpopular Science by David H. Silver: hand-drawn science doodles by Jess DG Hayes around the title

This chapter is one of fifty in Unpopular Science.

For readers curious enough to want the actual mathematics, tired of science communication that oversimplifies or sensationalizes. Science as it actually is: demanding, complex, but well worth the effort.